<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DuelLab Blog</title>
    <link>https://duellab.org/blog/</link>
    <description>Benchmark findings, methodology notes, and DuelLab project updates.</description>
    <item>
      <title>Near the top, generation cost varies by 6.4× — DuelLab</title>
      <link>https://duellab.org/blog/near-the-top-generation-cost-varies-sixfold</link>
      <guid>https://duellab.org/blog/near-the-top-generation-cost-varies-sixfold</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>GPT-5.6 Sol nearly matches the GameBench 2 leader but costs 6.4× as much to generate. Across GPT-5.6, XHigh costs 22–88× as much as Medium in this test.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In GameBench 2, more reasoning is not always better — DuelLab</title>
      <link>https://duellab.org/blog/more-reasoning-is-not-always-better</link>
      <guid>https://duellab.org/blog/more-reasoning-is-not-always-better</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>GameBench 2 asks AI models to write game-playing programs. Of 15 models tested at three reasoning settings, 12 score best at the highest and three at None.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introducing GameBench 2 — DuelLab</title>
      <link>https://duellab.org/blog/introducing-gamebench-2</link>
      <guid>https://duellab.org/blog/introducing-gamebench-2</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>GameBench 2 evaluates game-playing programs written by AI models through compilation and head-to-head matches, while reporting reliability and generation cost.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GPT-5.5 wins the middle — DuelLab</title>
      <link>https://duellab.org/blog/gpt-5-5-wins-the-middle</link>
      <guid>https://duellab.org/blog/gpt-5-5-wins-the-middle</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>GPT-5.5 leads DuelLab's medium-reasoning track while trailing overall, revealing a sharper mid-effort profile than GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus 4.7 right now.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kimi K2.6 tops mixed play — DuelLab</title>
      <link>https://duellab.org/blog/kimi-k2-6-mixed-play</link>
      <guid>https://duellab.org/blog/kimi-k2-6-mixed-play</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Kimi K2.6 ranks sixth overall in DuelLab but leads mixed play, powered by a stronger highest-effort game program than Kimi K2.5 across hidden games today.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Claude 4.7: a V-shaped effort curve — DuelLab</title>
      <link>https://duellab.org/blog/claude-4-7-medium-regression</link>
      <guid>https://duellab.org/blog/claude-4-7-medium-regression</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Claude Opus 4.7 edges 4.6 overall in DuelLab, but its per-track results reveal a V-shaped effort curve with a weaker medium setting in game play today.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introducing the DuelLab blog — DuelLab</title>
      <link>https://duellab.org/blog/introducing-duellab</link>
      <guid>https://duellab.org/blog/introducing-duellab</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>What DuelLab is today, where its AI-generated game-playing benchmark is heading next, and why the project is opening a technical blog for updates and methods.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
